Skip to main content

API & MCP is LIVE! Use it in your Claude and ChatGPT!Check it out!

Skip to main content
ComparisonVendor sites checked 12 November 2026

VETR vs Responsive

Responsive is response-management software for RFPs, security questionnaires and due-diligence requests, built around a shared content library. VETR is federal proposal management for small and set-aside contractors.

Capability comparison

Side by side.

VETR and Responsive compared, capability by capability
CapabilityVETRResponsive
Built for SDVOSB / WOSB set-aside work
VETR: set-aside status drives matching, teaming and the 13 CFR 125.6 subcontracting limits.
YesNot found on their site
Solicitation shred into a compliance matrix (Sections L and M)
YesShreds RFPs and generates a compliance matrix (Requirements Analysis); Sections L/M not found on their site
AI drafting from your own content
YesYes
Reusable content library
YesYes
Security questionnaires and DDQs
NoYes
Review workflow
VETR: Pink, Red and Gold reviews; the AI pass reads the drafted sections and the requirements.
YesStaged review and approval workflows and an AI TRACE Score check of answers; color teams not found on their site
Opportunity discovery and bid/no-bid
YesGo/no-go support; opportunity search not found on their site
Pricing analysis
VETR: FPDS award bands by NAICS, and a price-to-win estimate modelled on your own won bids once five of them record both your price and the government estimate.
YesNot found on their site
Published prices and a free trial
YesEntry edition has a published starting price; others via sales
AI processing inside AWS GovCloud, every language-model call on Amazon Bedrock
VETR's own AI features never send proposal or RFP content to an external AI provider.
YesHosted on AWS in a region the customer chooses; OpenAI and Microsoft Azure AI listed as optional subprocessors; a government-cloud option not found on their site
Microsoft Word add-in
VETR: on Professional and Enterprise plans, installed from a manifest; not yet in Microsoft AppSource.
PartialYes
SharePoint and Salesforce connections
VETR: a Salesforce Government Cloud sync is in preparation; no SharePoint connector.
NoYes
SOC 2
In preparationSOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001, per its security page
FedRAMP
Not authorized; preparing to engageCheck the FedRAMP Marketplace

Responsive’s cells come from its own website, checked 12 November 2026. “Not found on their site” means we did not find it stated, not that the product lacks it. VETR’s cells are checked against the shipped product. Product names are trademarks of their owners, and Responsive did not review or endorse this page. Vendor site: responsive.io. Spot something out of date? Tell us.

FAQ

The questions buyers actually ask.

Is VETR or Responsive better for federal proposals?

It depends on the work. Responsive is response-management software for RFPs, security questionnaires and due-diligence requests, built around a content library, and it can shred an RFP into a compliance matrix. We did not find federal Section L/M or set-aside features described on its website (checked 12 November 2026). VETR is built for federal proposals from small and set-aside contractors: it shreds the solicitation into a compliance matrix, drafts and reviews against it, and handles set-aside eligibility and teaming natively.

Does VETR answer security questionnaires like Responsive?

No. Security questionnaires and due-diligence requests are a strength of Responsive and not something VETR is built for. VETR focuses on federal solicitations: requirements, compliance, drafting, colour-team review and set-aside rules.

How do the two price?

VETR publishes its prices on its pricing page with a free trial. Responsive publishes a starting price for its entry edition and quotes higher editions through sales.

Choose by the work in front of you.

If your team answers many RFPs, security questionnaires and DDQs from a shared answer library across industries, Responsive is built for that. If you are a small or veteran-owned federal contractor whose bids turn on Sections L and M, set-aside rules and compliance, VETR was built for your case.

Comparing more broadly? Each category has a guide covering what the category means, how to evaluate products in it, and who the alternatives are - the full capability list is on the features page, and the scoring methodology is published as the VETR Framework.

Head-to-head comparisons